Hmmm idk I think Starkey understands Henry VIII better but Lipscomb understands Anne Boleyn better??
Like as historians not as people (because imo they’ve both said some…terrible things in the public sphere) I guess I’d say Starkey, he’s had a longer career and his Royal Inventory of Henry VIII has done so much for our understanding of both the man and the Henrician era. Lipscomb might catch up eventually but the research he’s done so far is invaluable and indispensable; a lot of historians mention him and his work in the dedications of their books and with good reason.
I mean honestly I’ve varied on a lot on this spectrum over the years; I feel like it’s always adjusted at least a smidge anytime after I read a paper on this topic.
I’d say I believed most in the third one when I was like, 13-20 and that in retrospect that was more influenced by fiction than research.
Right now I’m pretty dead-center on the second one; with the caveat that I think it was Cromwell’s idea initially, not Henry’s. I’ve never been the first, because it’s literally impossible– a jury convicted her, and ultimately Henry had to sign her execution warrant for it be carried out. It could only be the first one if Cromwell literally had her murdered by an assassin or himself, via poison etc.