Hmmm… mixed? I can’t post any excerpts right now because I’m on mobile; but she cited Nicholas Sanders as an ‘Elizabethan writer’ without mention that he was a Catholic priest and polemicist (that claimed Anne Boleyn– who he’d never seen, as he was born 1530 and not at court– had several deformities, and oh yeah, was also Henry VIII’s illegitimate daughter!) in her Jane Seymour bio.
In her bio on Bessie Blount she also said (in a very weirdly…pointed sort of tone) that she had “many traits that would have made her a better Queen Consort than Anne Boleyn, had Henry CARED to notice them” which.. djsjsjsjsj….
I mean, for one, she was already married and had several children with her husband by the time Henry was looking into an annulment, for another, her father was an extremely minor nobleman while Anne’s lineage was far more connected to royalty (for all the pearl-clutchers that are still, in the year 2018, going on about the audacity of Henry ‘diluting the royal line with COMMON blood’…Thomas Boleyn had claims to Ormond and Elizabeth Howard was the daughter of the Duke of Norfolk and the Countess of Surrey).

