I really cannot overstate …. how much I hate like…when a blogger and/or Tudor fiction author will say smth along the lines of ‘you should trust me because I’m not a historian’.
Implication being, I suppose, that historians go out of their way to lie to their readers or audience or w/e and I don’t really feel like that’s the case?
It’s more like they’re communicating their interpretation of events. And of course, you can take or leave that, and there’s nothing wrong with a healthy dose of skepticism and I think you should always check the primary source they reference to see quotes in context when you can ….
At the same time; being so blasély dismissive of experts (and the sort of…my interpretation is the only valid one; I’m the only person devoid of bias and sentiment, tone that tends to go along with that) kind of feels like the history-circle version of extreme conspiracy theorists’ ‘Fake News’ and tbh?? I don’t care for it.

@maharanis tbh, it’s…especially frustrating when author in question has a tumblr, is like Here Is My Controversial Take With 0 Evidence, and 0 Historians that Endorse It and the response is like. 72k notes shshhs



